Abstract Submission Deadline: Monday, May 1st
The annual ACSSA-sponsored Undergraduate Research Symposium in Chemistry and Biochemistry is the key platform for undergraduate researchers in the chemical sciences to present their work to our academic community at UC San Diego.
We encourage ALL students – regardless of year or study or stage of research - to take advantage of this opportunity to practice scholarly communication, to receive feedback from faculty and peers, and to make new professional connections. See below for additional symposium details.
ADDITIONAL SYMPOSIUM DETAILS:
The symposium will comprise a poster session and reception (5:00-6:30 PM in the NSB Foyer), followed by a plenary speaker and awards ceremony (6:30-7:00 PM in NSB 1205). Both academic and industrial judges will be present to give feedback on student’s posters.
ALL participants will be awarded a certificate in recognition of their scholarship. Additionally, cash prizes will be granted to the top poster presentations in each of the five divisions, and to the student who displays the most proficient use of chemical information skills. We will also honor the recipients of the Departmental Mayer and Urey awards.
These awards, and the event itself, are made possible by the generous support of our Department, the Division of Physical Sciences, the Science and Engineering Library, and sponsors from the local chemical industry.
Additional guidelines on writing abstracts and designing effective poster presentations can be found here.
Your abstract, when submitted, requires the following information:
It is sometimes said that once a student can successfully write an abstract, he/she is ready to graduate with his/her PhD. Unfortunately, reading this page will not allow you to skip graduate school...but hopefully it will help you write your abstract, especially if it's your first time doing so.
An abstract is an abstraction of the information you are trying to present. What does this mean? This means that the abstract is the extract of your paper, poster, or talk: a consise summary, and words about possible future work, perhaps. But why create a summary of your work? To save time. Abstracts are designed so that the busy scientist can read the abstract, and quickly determine whether or not the work is worth reading. (Note: As undergraduates participating in our symposium, we consider all of your work worth reading. I am generalizing to the "Real World.") As such, it is clear that your abstract should have the following qualities:
Obviously, the qualities listed above conflict with one another, but therein lies the challenge: to summarize your research while finding a good balance amongst all the qualities above.
After writing your abstract, get your graduate student, postdoc, or even P.I. to take a look at your abstract! As someone who has been in academia, your advisors have experience with this sort of thing, and they might have more tips for you!
Finally, here is a sample abstract submission from a previous symposium year:
The crossover of avian influenza into the human population could potentially lead to a worldwide pandemic. Considerable effort has been directed towards finding inhibitors for the avian flu protein neuraminidase. Recently, an alternative binding site for the natural substrate, sialic acid, on the surface of neuraminidase has been identified. We are investigating the effects of the presence of this site on the association kinetics of productive binding to the active site with a computational approach utilizing Brownian Dynamics (BD) simulations. In addition to studying the natural substrate sialic acid, we are carrying out BD studies with currently utilized inhibitor osteltamivir. Preliminary simulations involving the binding of osteltamivir with the monomeric form of neuraminidase matched published experimental rate constants. Although experimental data is unavailable for sialic acid, it exhibited slower binding kinetics than osteltamivir. This is in accordance with physical intuition given sialic acid's less favorable electrostatic interactions with neuraminidase. We have expanded the scope of our investigations to study the more biologically relevant tetrameric form of neuraminidase. These studies have the potential to help direct efforts to rationally design small-molecule inhibitors for neuraminidase.
While this abstract is in no way a perfect abstract, it finds a general balance of the qualities of a good abstract. It is relatively short, yet gets the point of the poster accross. It is, however, also sufficiently vague that it gives some leeway for more experiments to be done between the submission of the abstract and the actual presentation. It is also not written informally. Also no chart or graphs in the abstract, plain text only
Two more examples of abstract
Jack Boissonnault, Min Kim, Phuong V. Dau
Principal Investigator: Seth M. Cohen
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, UCSD
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are a class of materials with applications stemming from their porosity and the chemical tunability of the pores. We can introduce functional groups into a single MOF crystal, but it is difficult to control the positions of multiple groups within the framework. We accomplished positional control by placing two orthogonal functional groups on single ligands, controlling position in the ligand synthesis. These regioisomeric ligands were introduced into two different Zn2+ based MOFs. The first was the flexible DMOF-1 (DMOF = dabco MOF) system where, depending on the regioisomer used, flexibility of the MOF was changed giving different gas sorption properties. The second framework was the more porous and rigid UMCM-1 (UMCM = University of Michigan Crystalline Material) framework where we observed that the regioisomer had an effect in the synthesis of the UMCM-1. Postsynthetic modification (PSM) was performed on these UMCM-1 derivatives with several reagents. We found that the rate of PSM was dependant on the reagent size and not the pore size.
Eric C. Warren, Manuel Kaulich
Principal Investigator: Steven F. Dowdy
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, UCSD
The widely accepted model of G1 cell cycle progression proposes cyclin D:Cdk4/6 inactivates the retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein (Rb) during early G1 phase by progressive multi-phosphorylation or hypo-phosphorylation to release E2F transcription factors, resulting in the activation of cyclin E:Cdk2 and transition into late G1 phase. However, due to the use of supra-physiologic overexpression studies, this model remains largely unproven biologically and there has been no method to microscopically view cells as they transit across the restriction point in real time. To help address this problem, I designed a GFP fusion protein with p27, a protein that is stable in early G1 phase, but rapidly degraded at the restriction point due to phosphorylation by active cyclin E:Cdk2 complexes. Transfection of the p27-GFP fusion reporter into cells shows cell cycle specific expression. The p27-GFP fusion protein allows for the first time, the potential to visually dissect events that occur before and immediately after the restriction point.
Hopefully this page gives you some idea of how to write your abstract! Best of luck!
Science is a collaborative endeavor. In this modern day and age, scientists don't work completely alone in some secret laboratory behind a bookshelf. Thus, it is necessary to credit everyone who was involved.
The primary author(s) consist of all of the primary undergraduate researcherss involved on the project.
Other authors include any graduate student or postdoctoral fellow advisors, any collaborators, and the P.I.
When filling out the form, please only mention primary authors in the "Primary Author(s)" field. However, in the actual abstract, please include the full au thor list.
In addition, the authors on the paper are required to have seen your abstract and poster before you present it
Note: typically, the author list is in order of amount of work put into the project, with the final author being the P.I.
For example, "Sung JC, Van Wynsberghe AW, Amaro RE, Li WW, McCammon JA" would most likely mean that J. C. Sung was the main worker on the project, while A. W. Van Wynsberghe, R. E. Amaro, and W. W. Li were advisors, colleagues, and/or collaborators.J. A. McCammon would most likely be J. C. Sung's PI.
In the "Primary Author(s) Email(s)" field of the abstract submitter, only the emails of the primary undergraduates involved on the project need to be given.
Only the primary author(s)'s email(s) need be included in the actual abstract itself as well.
If it is more than one person's email, please include in the abstract only and include only 1 email on the submission form.
In the context of scientific research, P.I. stands for "Principal Investigator."
The P.I. for a specific project is the person whose funding pays for the project. Even if you do more of the investigating, you are not the P.I.
Generally, the head of the lab is the P.I.
If your research is interdisciplinary, simply choose any one of the fields your project is a part of. Division include
As an attendee of ACSSA's Annual Undergraduate Chemistry Research Symposium, you have the option of participating in the Best Poster Competition.
Each competition participant's poster is judged amongst the other competitors in his/her division. The top poster in each division wins a cash prize!
Monday, May 1st
Join our Facebook event page for more details!
Proudly Sponsored by: